Sometimes I like to start with a story. I’m hoping that this story will send this
post in the direction of my thoughts, so read on for a bit and you’ll see where
I want to end up. Please note, though, I
went back through my archives to see if I used this before and I don’t think I
did (?) but if I’m repeating myself, just hang on a bit.
Several years ago, I posted a picture of my daughter on
Facebook. We had a long great day
somewhere doing something…I don’t even remember. She was asleep in her carseat. We know those moments…so sweet and QUIET…anyway. Got some likes, some “how cute!s” – you know
the drill. I also got a private message
from an old friend, who wanted me to know that the carseat straps were not in
the right place.
Now, I could have gotten defensive. I could have blown it off. But I didn’t; instead, I was effusively
grateful. And you know what? I made sure those straps were in the right
darn place EVERY TIME I strapped her in until we went to the booster seat. EVERY TIME.
Because I didn’t know it on my own, another mom stepped in to help me out. She wanted her knowledge of safety
precautions to help me.
So here’s where I’m going.
A couple weeks ago, there was some online discussion of some photos that
were taken by child photographers. (As
in, adult photographers who shoot children.)
My initial reaction was that I wanted to share some thoughts on those,
but I couldn’t because I was outrageously busy taking care of ailing family
members and going about the usual summer mom stuff. I was just too busy to write and too tired at
night to get started…and I’m actually glad some time went by. I will say point blank that believe that
photography is a form of art and that photographers work to capture a vision –
whether it’s a head shot, editorial piece, or purely an artistic image –
through the lens of a camera to preserve a tiny bit of time into a long lasting
image. We hire people to shoot our kids
because, hey, we don’t have what it takes.
That said, there were two types of photos involved in the discussion:
one type was capturing girls performing authentic movements and the other was
more artistic, in which a child was used to create a scene as imagined by the
photographer. It’s really immaterial for
me to describe the specific photos in this post. They exist; they’re controversial; they
feature children; people reacted.
What I decided to address, instead of the images themselves,
were the reactions that moms had to the images.
Two reactions, in particular, got my mind buzzing a little bit. And you’ll see where I was leading with the
carseat story. I’m going to start
backwards, though.
First, here’s an argument that really pisses me off. Sorry if this argument belongs to you, but it’s
a bad one. I’ve heard it before and I
saw it again this time, so it’s out there.
“If you think the images would be
attractive to a pervert, you’re the one thinking like a pervert.” Um, NO.
Many of us moms actually think about what types of images may cross
lines we don’t want our children crossing.
See, here’s the thing. WE, as adults,
can make decisions for ourselves. Our
children CANNOT. I can decide if I want
to wear a low-cut shirt or booty shorts (I don’t) and I can deal with whatever
fallout there may be. Maybe it’s
catcalls or maybe it’s a tremendous sense of confidence that I’ve got it and
can flaunt it (or maybe I just don’t care what people think and that’s cool,
too). Our children cannot
intellectualize the potential reactions that people may have to what they wear
or how they appear and while we want to build healthy body image or recognize
their talents, WE need to be the filter that decides how our children are
presented. There’s a reason our parents
didn’t want us wearing a full-face of makeup when we were eight. It wasn’t just because it wouldn’t look
right; it was also because they knew we shouldn’t really appear adult until we
were actual adults. Adults are
sexualized constantly. Hormones arrived
during puberty and control sex drives. I
can defend myself if someone makes an advance toward me and I can understand
that I will probably be seen as a sexual object to someone, somewhere, at some
point.
Here’s what really sucks about that argument. Our society has created laws that define what
are inappropriate looks for children.
Lawmakers, law enforcement officials, prosecutors, judges, and juries
examine those laws daily – to decipher what falls into the category of right
and wrong legally – and those people are probably not perverts. Asking a jury to determine if an image is
child pornography is not asking the jury to think like perverts. It is asking them to make an objective
decision based on a legal framework created by our elected officials. Who, I’m reasonably sure, were probably not
thinking like perverts when they made the laws.
The laws were made to punish people who create and disseminate images
determined to be inappropriate enough to be illegal. So, again, NO, trying to objectively analyze
something to determine if it is inappropriate does NOT make someone a pervert.
Now, all that laid out, none of the images featured children
in any pose or state of undress that would technically be rendered illegal. If that were the case, it would be in the
hands of justice by now. I will say,
though, that many perceived these images to be closer to NOT okay on the
continuum of what is or is not acceptable for images of children. And many thought they were TOO close to not
okay. Now, I probed a little bit. I talked to the photographers in each case,
and gained some insight into their work.
It was helpful for me because I understand where their images came from
and I invited them to engage in some of the online discussions to defend their
work. There are two (or seven or a
hundred) sides to these stories or perspectives, and it is fair to acknowledge
that they have reasons for their creations and that they stand by their
images. I’m not entirely sure that they
knew about or could predict all of the reactions and fallout from the
discussions, but to be part of a discussion about the images was probably more
productive than getting second or third hand interpretations.
The next argument that I don’t like is: “Not my circus; not my monkeys.”
In other words, these are not my children, and it’s not my place to get
involved in the discussion/controversy/or, dare I say, drama. This is actually
a great argument in many real-life circumstances: workplace drama, for
example. And, actually, many parenting
issues. But when children are put in a
compromised position; and yes, I am suggesting that these are compromised
positions – and I mean that as, they may be bad positions, but they may not be.
You decide. (And “positions” here is
both literal and figural.) My child
being strapped incorrectly put her in a compromised position. For all the time I had her in wrong, was she
harmed? No. Could
she have been harmed in an accident?
Absolutely. Get what I’m
saying? I’ve said before that it is hard
enough to be a parent without people judging you. And it is.
But when someone steps in and asks you to really think about a situation
in which your child may be unsafe, isn’t it reasonable for a person to put that
out there for parents to know? What if
we framed these concerns in civil discourse, and gave parents multiple
perspectives to consider when they could be putting their child in legitimate
harm’s way?
As an advocate for children in the performing arts, I WANT parents
to hear my advice. I am getting into
their circus and trying to help them protect their monkeys. But if anyone has a perspective that may help
other parents, isn’t that fair to share?
Haven’t you experienced moms ever suggested to a new mom a way to get a
baby to sleep? Are you judging her, or are you trying to give
her another idea? Aren’t we kind of in
this together at some point?
Look, what’s done is done.
The kids in those photos all over social media are there. Can’t undo it. But maybe some parents will hear/read these
arguments and say, you know what? I’m
going to think twice about putting my kid out there. ALL of us, and I mean model/actor moms and
moms not in the industry, probably have photos of our kids on the
internet. Some photos are going to be
more likely than others to end up in the eyes of perverts and sickos. Come on; you need to realize this. If you know this and still want your kid to
be in the photo, take one step further.
Will your kid want to be in this photo? I made this point before, but I’ll drill it
in. The other day, my mom reminded me
that I can make decisions for myself; my wife can make decisions for herself;
but my daughter cannot. (I think my mom
probably thinks we’re a bit too free-range in how we raise our daughter; and,
honestly, she’s probably right. I think
she was referring to bedtime. Hell, it
could have been anything.) By being a
parent, you are charged with not only making parenting decisions for yourself,
but also “childing” decisions for your kiddo.
Couple examples here.
A parent recently shared with me that her son did a shoot for
Pull-ups. Cool, right? He was on packages for years! Years.
Like, from the time he was five until he was ten. Ten.
Can you imagine the teasing this kid faced when peers saw his picture on
a Pull-ups bag? It sucked for that
kid. Another mom shared that her
daughter did a Halloween costume shoot and her daughter was put in a costume
that ended up in a widely-published article about inappropriate costumes for
kids. She was mortified.
Let me throw this out there.
If you put your tween on the internet in really revealing poses, are you
going to be happy with all the boys in her school passing around that picture
on their cell phones? Trust me; I taught
high school for 21 years – I’ve seen it happen.
And it doesn’t take much to get a hormonal boy excited. Even if it’s an authentic pose that your
child is very, very proud of, imagine that camera angle being slightly
different, and it may not be so compromising.
I studied Misty Copeland’s Instagram feed, trying to see what kind of
poses she posts. Check it out. But remember: she’s an ADULT and she,
herself, can make the decision about what she posts. (And if you’ve seen ballet, we all know that
men’s junk is OUT THERE.)
Any time you post something, ask yourself: will this photo
end up on every fourteen-year-old boy’s phone in your daughter’s class? Is this photo likely to appear on the
computer screen of a forty-year-old man’s computer at 3:00 am? Will my child hate me in five/ten years for
posting this? If you are totally
confident in your answers to these questions – and if your child would be
totally confident in the answers – go for it.
If not? Or if you are
unsure? Stop. Please.
If you want to read more, check out my archives, like my
facebook page (I let you know there when I have a new post), my Instagram, or
email me at theBizzyMama@gmail.com One thing: don’t message me through facebook
since I don’t get those notifications (boo on that glitch) – email is
better! Thanks for reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment